Darryl james dating
Have we arrived at a place where we can exchange sex freely without connecting it to anything?
The answer can only be determined by examining what once was and what currently is.
Since that era, there has been more sex, but no real growth in ideas about sex and/or sexuality–just chaos and confusion.
Particularly, since the results are arguably negative and backward, which is a sign of de-evolution.
Most still want it today—even after participating in free love, hence the pursuit of redefining “whore.” So what happens when the sex is given and no connection is given in exchange?
Frankly, women and children cannot afford the wages of sexual freedom.
Participating in discussions with women who want random and prolific sexual proclivities to be recognized as evolution and not just plain whorishness gives another example of the misuse of evolution.
Particularly when some of those same women express regret over pursuing lust instead of love, and exchanging sex for gifts or for nothing at all, only to end up with no human emotional attachment after the “freedom” has been expressed.
Things have changed, but that doesn’t make it evolution. After all, isn’t random, unattached sex what humans were doing before we formed societies—before we were civilized?
If there were a true evolution, the oxytocin that gets released when a woman is held by a man she has been sexed by wouldn’t be as strong.
If we were truly evolved, it would no longer be easy to define a whore and a lady–and, let’s be honest, the definitions have not changed.